10. Walter's Dividend Model
Walter's Dividend Model
Walter's model supports the principle that dividends are relevant. The investment
policy of a firm cannot be separated from its dividend policy and both are inter-related.
The choice of an appropriate dividend policy affects the value of an enterprise.
Assumptions of this model:
- Retained earnings are the only source of finance. This means that the company does not rely upon external funds like debt or new equity capital.
- The firm's business risk does not change with additional investments undertaken. It implies that r(internal rate of return) and k(cost of capital) are constant.
- There is no change in the key variables, namely, beginning earnings per share(E), and dividends per share(D). The values of D and E may be changed in the model to determine results, but any given value of E and D are assumed to remain constant in determining a given value.
- The firm has an indefinite life.
Formula: Walter's model
P | = |
D
Ke – g |
Where: | P | = | Price of equity shares |
D | = | Initial dividend | |
Ke | = | Cost of equity capital | |
g | = | Growth rate expected |
After accounting for retained earnings, the model would be:
P | = |
D
Ke – rb |
Where: | r | = | Expected rate of return on firm’s investments |
b | = | Retention rate (E - D)/E |
Equation showing the value of a share (as present value of all dividends plus the
present value of all capital gains) – Walter's model:
P | = |
D + r/ke (E - D)
ke |
Where: | D | = | Dividend per share and |
E | = | Earnings per share |
Example:
A company has the following facts:
Cost of capital (ke) = 0.10
Earnings per share (E) = $10
Rate of return on investments ( r) = 8%
Dividend payout ratio: Case A: 50% Case B: 25%
Show the effect of the dividend policy on the market price of the shares.
A company has the following facts:
Cost of capital (ke) = 0.10
Earnings per share (E) = $10
Rate of return on investments ( r) = 8%
Dividend payout ratio: Case A: 50% Case B: 25%
Show the effect of the dividend policy on the market price of the shares.
Solution:
Case A:
Case B:
Case A:
D/P ratio = 50%
When EPS = $10 and D/P ratio is 50%, D = 10 x 50% = $5
When EPS = $10 and D/P ratio is 50%, D = 10 x 50% = $5
P | = |
5 + [0.08 / 0.10] [10 - 5]
0.10 |
=> $90 |
Case B:
D/P ratio = 25%
When EPS = $10 and D/P ratio is 25%, D = 10 x 25% = $2.5
When EPS = $10 and D/P ratio is 25%, D = 10 x 25% = $2.5
P | = |
2.5 + [0.08 / 0.10] [10 - 2.5]
0.10 |
=> $85 |
Conclusions of Walter's model:
- When r > ke, the value of shares is inversely related to the D/P ratio. As the D/P ratio increases, the market value of shares decline. It’s value is the highest when D/P ratio is 0. So, if the firm retains its earnings entirely, it will maximize the market value of the shares. The optimum payout ratio is zero.
- When r < ke, the D/P ratio and the value of shares are positively correlated. As the D/P ratio increases, the market price of the shares also increases. The optimum payout ratio is 100%.
- When r = ke, the market value of shares is constant irrespective of the D/P ratio. In this case, there is no optimum D/P ratio.
Limitations of this model:
- Walter's model assumes that the firm's investments are purely financed by retained earnings. So this model would be applicable only to all-equity firms.
- The assumption of r as constant is not realistic.
- The assumption of a constant ke ignores the effect of risk on the value of the firm.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home